I decided to review records directly in the Zheln format as for that, I require:
(a) clickable links to quickly open record abstracts or full texts
(b) clickable checkboxes to set steps completetion, tags, and categories
(c) one-click switch between records to quickly move to the next records
(d) text fields to enter the post title & some appraisal text if ready at this point
Of these, (a), (c), and (d) are already available from my bash-generated Markdown posts when viewed with VS Code, while (b) is also readily available if enable GitHub-Flavored Markdown with the Markdown Preview Enhanced Extension.
Therefore, only some intermediary bash processing is required to create an editable version of the posts first & to convert them into posts for publication eventually.
So Iβm working on the bash scripts currently. Making progress, will finish on schedule.
Down below is a sample editable version of a post (draft).
The options that do not require editing, such as Step 1 or untouched π steps, are not listed in the editable version for clarity and will be added to the record automatically on pre-publication compilation.
title: "Vein Choice in DIEP Flap"
summary: "A Zheln appraisal record downloaded from the PubMed Systematic Subset daily updates."
thumbnail: journal-whills
[x] awaiting crowdfunding
[ ] appraisal in progress
[ ] appraisal complete
Zhelnov P. A critical appraisal of βPignatti M, Pinto V, Giorgini FA, Lozano Miralles ME, D'Arpa S, Cipriani R, De Santis G. Different Hydraulic Constructs to Optimize the Venous Drainage of DIEP Flaps in Breast Reconstruction: Decisional Algorithm and Review of the Literature. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 Sep 1. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716349. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32871602β. Zheln. 2020 Sep 2;36β38(1):r2d2. URI: {{ page.url | absolute_url }}.
[ ] 2. β Does Not Meet Shojania & Bero 2001 True Positive Criteria for Systematic Reviews by Neither Title nor Abstract
[ ] 2. β Meets Shojania & Bero 2001 True Positive Criteria for Systematic Reviews by Title
[x] 2. β Meets Shojania & Bero 2001 True Positive Criteria for Systematic Reviews by Abstract
[ ] 3. β No Full Text Available to Zheln
[x] 3. β Full Text Collected by Zheln
[ ] 3. β Other Reports Collected by Zheln
[ ] 3. β Full Text & Other Reports Collected by Zheln
[ ] 4. β Does Not Generate Pragmatic Evidence Directly Relevant to Evidence-Based Practice
[ ] 4. β Generates Pragmatic Evidence Directly Relevant to Evidence-Based Practice
[ ] 5. β Is Duplicate
[ ] 5. β Not Found Duplicate by Zheln
[ ] 6. β Failed Replication
[ ] 6. β Passed Replication
[ ] 7. β Has Critical Conduct Flaws
[ ] 7. β No Critical Conduct Flaws Identified by Zheln
[ ] 7. β No Conduct Flaws Identified by Zheln
[ ] 8. π Disliked by Zheln
[ ] 8. π Liked by Zheln
[ ] 9. β Practical Implications Summarized by Zheln
[ ] 10. β Appraisal Published & Call for Crowdfunding
I decided to review records directly in the Zheln format as for that, I require:
Of these, (a), (c), and (d) are already available from my bash-generated Markdown posts when viewed with VS Code, while (b) is also readily available if enable GitHub-Flavored Markdown with the Markdown Preview Enhanced Extension.
Therefore, only some intermediary bash processing is required to create an editable version of the posts first & to convert them into posts for publication eventually.
So Iβm working on the bash scripts currently. Making progress, will finish on schedule.
Down below is a sample editable version of a post (draft).
The options that do not require editing, such as Step 1 or untouched π steps, are not listed in the editable version for clarity and will be added to the record automatically on pre-publication compilation.
title: "Vein Choice in DIEP Flap"
summary: "A Zheln appraisal record downloaded from the PubMed Systematic Subset daily updates."
thumbnail: journal-whills
Zhelnov P. A critical appraisal of βPignatti M, Pinto V, Giorgini FA, Lozano Miralles ME, D'Arpa S, Cipriani R, De Santis G. Different Hydraulic Constructs to Optimize the Venous Drainage of DIEP Flaps in Breast Reconstruction: Decisional Algorithm and Review of the Literature. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 Sep 1. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716349. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32871602β. Zheln. 2020 Sep 2;36β38(1):r2d2. URI: {{ page.url | absolute_url }}.
tags:
Originally posted by @pussiatoday in https://github.com/drzhelnov/zheln.github.io/issues/7#issuecomment-695774594