./miryungkim/datascientists.md

[timm]

After review, relabel to 'reviewTwo'. After second review, relabel to 'EditorsComment'.

[meido]

Title of chapter

How Data Scientists can Effectively Impact Organizations

URL to the chapter

https://github.com/ds4se/chapters/blob/master/miryungkim/datascientists.md

Message?

Each subsection touches upon a key thing to consider before investing time and money on a data science project.

Accessible?

Yes. This is very accessible.

Small typo fixes:

• "The most accurate is to ask everybody all the time. " Maybe change this sentence to make it clear about what should be most accurate?
• Maybe include a section called references in the bottom. And add your affiliation at the top.
• close double quotes missing - "Technical Report MSR-TR-2015-30
• Some references have titles in quotes and others don't.

Size?

The size of the article seems to be good. If I were to add something then it would be a section on some things that were unexpected in their study. This could just been a cool addition. Not required though.

Gotta Mantra?

Dos and Don'ts of Data Science in a Software Company.

Best Points

Gives a succinct view on the experiences of data scientists + the example quotations adds a nice flair to it.

[emadshihab]

Title of chapter

How Data Scientists can Effectively Impact Organizations

URL to the chapter

https://github.com/ds4se/chapters/blob/master/miryungkim/datascientists.md

Message?

The chapter provides a practitioners perspective of the issues data scientists need to consider to make positive practical impacts.

Accessible?

The chapter is certainly accessible to a general audience. In addition, one really nice thing is the chapter is also technical enough to not be boring for a more technical audience. Kudos!

To improve, I would suggest adding a definition of data science, if possible.

Size?

The chapter is the right size. As suggested above, I would a definition of data science. Also, it seems like the chapter is about data from software systems, hence, I would add that this is data science for 'software' organizations.

Gotta Mantra?

I like the title, but perhaps re-framing it as a question may make it more interesting. Something like: What do practitioners think about data science? or The Five Things You Need to Know About Data Science in Software Organizations.

Just suggestions, the current title is fine also.

Best Points

I love the go the last mile subsection. It is so true!

[timm]

Good chapter.

[miryung]

updated version of the chapter is committed to the repository.

[timm]

@miryung thanks for the revision.

Totally optional, but here's an idea:

• Add a prefix to all your sub-headings: e.g. Step1: Choose the Right Questions for the Right Team
• Remain the chapter: Five Steps for Success: How to Deploy Data Science in Your Organizations

Then tweak para1 just a little to say that "5 steps follow"

[miryung]

I have addressed Tim's comment and checked in a new version.