Adrita - Week 11 - PBL Final

[adritac-tech]

Adrita Grading Week 11 - 9.7/10

Team Final Grading

Individual Wikis

• Adrita
• Kaavya
• Rachel
• Sam

Github Pages

• PBL theme is consistent through project and described in Github Pages
• Sassy / Bootstrap illustration is present in GitHub page

  Database

• CRUD operations on project centered database tables and describe in GitHub Pages

  Deployed Project

• Deployment Overview and Policies described in GitHub Pages

  Async Operation

  Team Video

Individual Evaluation - Adrita

One PBL MVC feature - Database

• MVC feature was database (model, view, controller)
• Model
• View
• Controller

  Individual commits

• 42 commits
• Shows algorithms written in JS and/or Java

  Wiki

• Contains design ideas and usage

  Video

• displays the running of my program and demonstrates functionality I developed

[raad1masum]

Raadwan's review of Adrita's work - 9.7/10

Individual - 5/5

• (1/1) One PBL MVC feature: The MVC feature is a database with search functionality. The search functionality is pretty impressive. All aspects of MVC are shown.
• (1/1) Individual commits showing algorithms written in JS and/or Java: Adrita has 40 commits. Almost all of the commits are to do with JS and/or Java. The commit quantity and quality are good.
• (1/1) Wiki with design ideas and usage: The wiki shows all aspects of ideation, wireframe designs, and the timeline. This wiki is made so that a random person on the internet could get up to speed with the project. I like the detail and processes. FRQ highlights are also show, this is good.
• (1/1) Final program code: Code execution is flawless. Everything works as intended. The database search functionality is impressive and very nice to use. This implements what we learned in class with JPA, MVC, and algorithms.
• (1/1) 1-minute video: Video shows running of the program and an explanation of everything required. The video is comprehensive and well made.

  Team Grade - 4.7/5

• (0.5/0.5) PBL theme: The theme of the PBL design is consistent throughout the project. All pages follow the same color scheme and layout. The Github pages site has documentation regarding designing. All boxes are hit here.
• (0.4/0.5) Sassy/Bootstrap: The project uses Bootstrap for views. Bootstrap is used correctly to style the pages. There are scss files in the project as well. However, Bootstrap is not talked about at extent in the Github pages site. I will take off 0.1 points for this.
• (0.4/0.5) Database: An SQL database is being used in the project. CRUD operations are done on the database to use the data. The search feature for the database is really cool. The database is not talked about at extent in the Github pages site. I will take off 0.1 points for this.
• (0.5/0.5) Deployed Project: The project is deployed. Documentation is written for deployment and a guide for how to deploy is present. A random person on the internet would be able to deploy using the deployment guide.
• (0.4/0.5) Async Operation: Async is being used in the project. However, the use for async is not major. Async could have been used for a larger PBL purpose than is being used. I will take off 0.1 points for this.
• (0.5/0.5) Highlight of best features: The best features of the project are shown in the runtime. All of the highlights are shown in the video and it sells the project well. This video would be good to introduce a new person to the project.
• (0.5/0.5) Scrum Board: The scrum board is shown in the video and has all information. Completed tasks are listed in the scrum board under a completed tab. Github tangibles are present in the scrum board.
• (0.5/0.5) MVC Package: A complete MVC package is shown in the video. All aspects of model, view, and control are explained in the video.
• (0.5/0.5) Search on project database tables: A search is conducted on the database and this is shown in the video. The search is used to filter through aspects of the database and it works as intended.
• (0.5/0.5) Google Search: Google search is used to search the website. The search works well and uses Google to do it. Results from the website show up in the search.

Overall comments: I think this project ticks almost all of the boxes. The requirements are met. Finding information was easy and there was clarity of information. The only thing I think should be improved is documentation on Github pages. Documentation on design and database could have been more clear on the Github pages site.