Study Week 2 - Chenxin

[chenxin-chex]

Score: 4.5/5, Graded By: Akhil

Graded Kaavya: Kaavya's ticket

• [-/1] MCQ results: 32/40
• [-/1] MCQ corrections
• [-/1] FRQ code screenshots on github pages and running on Replit
• [-/1] Daily participation (have attended class everday last week)
• [-/.5] Quality of work

[algolg]

Score: 4.5/5 Graded By: Akhil

• [x] (1/1) MCQ results are given with a score well over 50%
• [x] (1/1) Written FRQ answers are on GitHub pages and code seems to be correct. Everything is very neat. One thing to watch out for is that we might be required to use pen on the AP exam.
• [x] (1/1) MCQ corrections are detailed and give good explanations for the correct answers. FRQs are deployed on Replit but it's hard to tell which part of the printed output belongs to each FRQ, so I would recommend adding details in the main method of the Main class.
• [x] (1/1) Participated daily last week and had a main role in ASI project
• [x] (0.5/5) High quality of work as shown by the detail put into MCQ corrections and FRQs

  Glows: Everything is complete and very thorough. FRQ solutions look correct on paper and MCQ scores are good given the 60 minute time limit.

Grows: While code works on Replit, I would recommend that you make the printed output more detailed or even add input. I also believe that it would be best of MCQ corrections were put on GitHub Pages rather than a Google Doc, but everything is complete so I wouldn't dock points for that.