Error after :require codax

[aaronpowered]

Any idea how to fix this? I really want to use it. :coldsweat: `clojure.lang.Compiler$CompilerException: clojure.lang.ExceptionInfo: Call to clojure.core/defn did not conform to spec: In: [0] val: codax.pathwise/encode-element fails spec: :clojure.core.specs.alpha/defn-args at: [:args :name] predicate: simple-symbol? :clojure.spec.alpha/args (codax.pathwise/encode-element [el65854] (clojure.core/cond (true? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 33) ((fn [] "") el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (date-time? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 36) (encode-date-time el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (neg-infinity? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 48) ((fn [] "") el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (pos-infinity? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 50) ((fn [] "") el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (number? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 49) (encode-number el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (symbol? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 104) (encode-symbol el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (false? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 32) ((fn [_] "") el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (string? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 112) (encode-string el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) ((fn [p165853#] (or (vector? p165853#) (list? p1_65853#))) el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 160) (encode-vector el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (keyword? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 105) (encode-keyword el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (nil? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 16) ((fn [] "") el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) :else (throw (java.lang.Exception. (clojure.core/str "no method for encoding " el65854 ""))))) {:clojure.spec.alpha/problems [{:path [:args :name], :pred simple-symbol?, :val codax.pathwise/encode-element, :via [:clojure.core.specs.alpha/defn-args :clojure.core.specs.alpha/defn-args], :in [0]}], :clojure.spec.alpha/args (codax.pathwise/encode-element [el65854] (clojure.core/cond (true? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 33) ((fn [] "") el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (date-time? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 36) (encode-date-time el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (neg-infinity? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 48) ((fn [] "") el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (pos-infinity? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 50) ((fn [] "") el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (number? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 49) (encode-number el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (symbol? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 104) (encode-symbol el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (false? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 32) ((fn [] "") el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (string? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 112) (encode-string el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) ((fn [p165853#] (or (vector? p165853#) (list? p1_65853#))) el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 160) (encode-vector el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (keyword? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 105) (encode-keyword el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) (nil? el65854) (clojure.core/str (clojure.core/char 16) ((fn [] "") el65854) codax.pathwise/+delim+) :else (throw (java.lang.Exception. (clojure.core/str "no method for encoding " el65854 "")))))}, compiling:(codax/pathwise.clj:108:1)`

[jessesherlock]

Just ran into the same one. It's the symbols in the two defns in the macro in that file. They are encode-element and decode-element instead of ~'encode-element and ~'decode-element which means they get fully qualified when expanded. Which means they fail the simple-symbol? predicate in the spec for defn.

Pretty damn subtle one. Got a patch coming soon as I totally test it out, but that seems to be the only issue.

[dscarpetti]

Thank you for the quick fix. I hadn't run the code with 1.9, so this has long gone unnoticed!

[sooheon]

Has this been pushed to Clojars? I'm not seeing the fix yet, but wondering if it's in the pipe.

[dscarpetti]

Pushed now.

[aaronpowered]

Thank you!