Closed ArieHein closed 8 years ago
Currently we support only one value in ConfigurationNames in full configuration scenarios. Multiple names are only accepted in partial configurations scenario.
Partial Configurations isnt supported or possible (atm) via AgentID regsitration though. So i need to use ConfigurationID, but using that means i cant use ConfigurationNames or am i missing something or the documentation is ?
hi @ArieHein Here is an example of meta configuration script that uses multiple configuration names with agent id and partial configurations:
[DscLocalConfigurationManager()]
Configuration RegistrationMetaConfigWithPartials
{
Settings
{
RefreshFrequencyMins = 30;
RefreshMode = "PULL";
ConfigurationMode =”ApplyAndAutocorrect“;
AllowModuleOverwrite = $true;
RebootNodeIfNeeded = $true;
ConfigurationModeFrequencyMins = 60;
}
ConfigurationRepositoryWeb ConfigurationManager
{
ServerURL = $serverURL
AllowUnsecureConnection = $true
RegistrationKey = $registrationKey
ConfigurationNames = @("Part1", "Part2")
}
PartialConfiguration Part1
{
Description = "Part1"
ConfigurationSource = @("[ConfigurationRepositoryWeb]ConfigurationManager")
}
PartialConfiguration Part2
{
Description = "Part2"
ConfigurationSource = @("[ConfigurationRepositoryWeb]ConfigurationManager")
}
}
RegistrationMetaConfigWithPartials
Set-DscLocalConfigurationManager -ComputerName localhost -Path .\RegistrationMetaConfigWithPartials –Verbose
@NarineM. Thank you for the example. What would be the naming convention for AgentID partial config mof files? As you know ConfigID partial config mofs are ConfigName.ConfigID.mof
I'm guessing ConfigName.AgentID.mof ?
@Zuldan It would by just ConfigName.mof.
Thanks Narine. This was already discussed on powershell.org after a blogger posted his successful results and after another person mentioned it.
It seems it has been fixed between my original post and now.
Thanks for the update in here as well.
ConfigurationNames accepts multiple values in the definition but using more then one gave errors. This was in 3.7.0.0 Is this still the case now ? If so, is this something you plan on addressing to allow multiple values ? What was the the reason to only accept it on first registration and not constantly ?
I have opened an idea on UserVoice to change the way ConfigurationNames work to both allow mutiple values and also accepts changes to its values constantly and not just on registration.