Closed danielboth closed 4 years ago
Merging #68 into dev will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
83.33%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #68 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 87.4% 87.4%
=====================================
Files 8 8
Lines 381 381
Branches 9 9
=====================================
Hits 333 333
Misses 39 39
Partials 9 9
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
...RDSessionDeployment/MSFT_xRDSessionDeployment.psm1 | 94.73% <83.33%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a2c0281...3f367d4. Read the comment docs.
The change looks good, but if it's a fix, is it possible to add a test that would have failed before and would now pass? I'm not saying that should be a blocking point for that release, unless @ld0614 has an objection, but it'd be great to ensure non-regression.
Thanks @gaelcolas, I've added a test.
Feel free to merge when and how you feel it's best ;)
Pull Request (PR) description
Small fix to Get-TargetResource in xRDSessionDeployment to not assume the connection broker as localhost, but to use the input from the user.
This PR includes some small fixes to the syntax of the file and it's tests.
This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues
Task list
This change is![Reviewable](https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg)