Congratulations on v1.0! (And thanks for your kind mention in the docs!) I'm taking a look at updating my Acorn port and I've noticed a possible bug in plvm02.s's SAW implementation. It ends with:
BMI +
JMP DROP
JMP FIXDROP
Shouldn't there be a leading '+' on the final line? As I read this that BMI will branch to the next '+' label inside ISGE:
Hi Dave,
Congratulations on v1.0! (And thanks for your kind mention in the docs!) I'm taking a look at updating my Acorn port and I've noticed a possible bug in plvm02.s's SAW implementation. It ends with:
Shouldn't there be a leading '+' on the final line? As I read this that BMI will branch to the next '+' label inside ISGE:
which won't do the right thing.
Cheers.
Steve