If I'm understanding correctly, indieweb-publisher uses a universal indieweb_publisher_option() function to check each option from the customizer
This replaces multiple functions that indepenent publisher has for each option . e.g. independent_publisher_use_single_column_layout()
The problem is that indieweb_publisher_option only checks one option: "indieweb_publisher_general_options"
But some of the theme settings are saved in other options:
indieweb_publisher_excerpt_options
indieweb_publisher_layout_options
Two solution ideas:
Merge all of the options into one field, either "indieweb_publisher_general_options" or simple "indieweb_publisher_options".
Pros: Simple
Cons: Potential for confusion if pulling in updates from independent publisher
Create three functions to capture all three fields
indieweb_publisher_general_option
indieweb_publisher_excerpt_option
indieweb_publisher_layout_option
Each of these functions could check a specific option field.
Pros: Maintain consistence with independent publisher
Cons: A bit more work. Loses some of the clarity of single function solution
Maybe related to #13
If I'm understanding correctly, indieweb-publisher uses a universal
indieweb_publisher_option()function to check each option from the customizerThis replaces multiple functions that indepenent publisher has for each option . e.g.
independent_publisher_use_single_column_layout()The problem is that
indieweb_publisher_optiononly checks one option: "indieweb_publisher_general_options"But some of the theme settings are saved in other options:
Two solution ideas:
Merge all of the options into one field, either "indieweb_publisher_general_options" or simple "indieweb_publisher_options".
Pros: Simple Cons: Potential for confusion if pulling in updates from independent publisher
Create three functions to capture all three fields
Each of these functions could check a specific option field. Pros: Maintain consistence with independent publisher Cons: A bit more work. Loses some of the clarity of single function solution