Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I've applied your patch as r340. Thanks for the patch and the detailed
analysis! Understanding the problem is much nicer than
simply sending the child process a SIGTERM (see r310).
Original comment by graham.g...@gmail.com
on 19 Nov 2009 at 10:44
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ens...@googlemail.com
on 18 Nov 2009 at 9:06Attachments: