Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
The problem is that the modules are defined with dynamic pin numbers for the
support of several TMs under the same sketch... the use of defines for pin
numbers doesn't really make sense with multiple modules, does it ?
The idea is that you can define several modules using specific pins for each
(or sharing the clk and data for the chaining of (up to six) modules.
Like this:
// chain of two modules
TM1638 module1_1(53, 52, 51);
TM1638 module1_2(53, 52, 50);
// independent module
TM1638 module2_1(49, 48, 47);
Would the several defines help ?
Original comment by rjbati...@gmail.com
on 27 Oct 2014 at 2:44
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
littleve...@gmail.com
on 26 Oct 2014 at 4:02