Closed mjyc closed 4 years ago
Is this covered by PR #73? Why are we changing the Link
header match?
Opps, I used a wrong comment reference, the correct one is at here https://github.com/dspinellis/git-issue/issues/70#issuecomment-607022134
I temporarily introduce Link
header match because I didn't know about what existing '^\(Status: 200\|HTTP/[[:digit:]].[[:digit:]] 200 OK\)'
match was doing, which I now think is a better rule to use.
Also is not covered by #73; that PR is fixing an export related problem and this one is fixing an import related problem (but essentially the same cause)
Thank you for the explanation! To avoid a confusing history, can you please force push a patch without the intermediate Link header match?
Modified commit history as requested
Thank you!
A quick fix based on findings from https://github.com/dspinellis/git-issue/issues/70#issuecomment-606142066