Closed xellos00 closed 1 year ago
@xellos00 I'll leave here for SDK version ASAP.
@xellos00 For about SDK, I created PR here. https://github.com/dsrvlabs/vatz/pull/105
@xellos00 For about SDK, I created PR here. #105
@rootwarp I created new issue for PR #105 and connected with it Please, create an issue that mapping with PR for next time.
@dsrvlabs/validator Can you register an issue that create a plugin for current vatz when you start development?
@dsrvlabs/validator I requested polls by yesterday at https://github.com/dsrvlabs/vatz/issues/157#issuecomment-1176321387 but only few members in Validator were responded. I am going to close the poll.
We are going to create a common plugins, but 1st hand, we need to sync all together.
├── Makefile
├── README.md
├── bin
│ ├── build_plugins.sh
│ ├── clean_plugins.sh
│ ├── start_plugins.sh
│ └── stop_plugins.sh
├── logs
│ ├── machine-status-cpu.log
│ ├── machine-status-disk.log
│ ├── machine-status-memory.log
│ ├── near-metric-alive.log
│ ├── near-metric-block-height.log
│ ├── near-metric-chunk-produce-rate.log
│ ├── near-metric-number-of-peer.log
│ ├── near-metric-uptime.log
│ └── sample.log
└── plugins
├── machine-status-cpu
│ ├── Makefile
│ ├── go.mod
│ ├── go.sum
│ └── main.go
├── machine-status-disk
│ ├── Makefile
│ ├── go.mod
│ ├── go.sum
│ └── main.go
├── machine-status-memory
│ ├── Makefile
│ ├── go.mod
│ ├── go.sum
│ └── main.go
├── near-metric-alive
│ ├── Makefile
│ ├── go.mod
│ ├── go.sum
│ └── main.go
├── near-metric-block-height
│ ├── Makefile
│ ├── go.mod
│ ├── go.sum
│ └── main.go
├── near-metric-chunk-produce-rate
│ ├── Makefile
│ ├── go.mod
│ ├── go.sum
│ └── main.go
├── near-metric-number-of-peer
│ ├── Makefile
│ ├── go.mod
│ ├── go.sum
│ └── main.go
└── near-metric-uptime
├── Makefile
├── go.mod
├── go.sum
└── main.go
TODOs for Everyone:
Please, check yourself if you've updated your protocol Due is end of Sprint 2022-07-20 Also Put machine info that VATZ is currently running.
near-testnet-validator
agoric-devnet-validator-do-nyc1
solana-testnet-validator-hetzner
Share Plugins
Requirements
- [ ] CPU
- [ ] DISK
- [ ] Memory
Requirements
- [ ] Process Up
Be my guest to develop for followings if you have time to do.
@dsrvlabs/validator 필수 참여자 @xellos00, @rootwarp , @hqueue 참여자:
at 2022-07-26 13:00:00 +09:00:00
Agenda
moreover, Install all
Official VATZ plugin
이번에는 꼭 영어로 적지 않으셔도 되니까 더 많은 의견으로 주시면 좋겠습니다.
Plugin Structure.
- Share mod로 바꾼다 (long term) 👍🏽
- 2가지, share-mod, individual (기준) 으로간다. 😄
- SDK가 그대로 인데, 안바꾼다. 👀
Official plugins(linux, tendermint, eth)
- vatz - plugin - {}
Plugin Structure.
- Share mod로 바꾼다 (long term) 👍🏽
- 2가지, share-mod, individual (기준) 으로간다. 😄
- SDK가 그대로 인데, 안바꾼다. 👀
Plugin Structure.
- Share mod로 바꾼다 (long term) 👍🏽
- 2가지, share-mod, individual (기준) 으로간다. 😄
- SDK가 그대로 인데, 안바꾼다. 👀
Official Plugin을 선정하여 guide로 공개한다. [필수적이라고 생각합니다]
개별적으로 개발한 plugin의 structure를 통일해야할 필요? [user의 쓰임에 맞게 놔두는게 낫다고 생각합니다]
Official Plugin을 Share mod로 바꾼다? [SDK도 release가 된다는 가정하에 official plugin만 변경되는건 혼란을 야기할것 같습니다.]
추가의견
제품의 완성도를 추구하는것 자체에는 이견이 없습니다. 다만 어차피 plugin을 따로 빌드해서 사용해야하는 user라면 mod를 share하는 방식은 기존 방법에 비해서 나아보이지 않습니다. 물론... 보기에는 좋을 수 있습니다.
Official plugins(linux, tendermint, eth)
- vatz - plugin - {}
Plugin Structure.
- Share mod로 바꾼다 (long term) 👍🏽
- 2가지, share-mod, individual (기준) 으로간다. 😄
- SDK가 그대로 인데, 안바꾼다. 👀
아래는 제가 생각한 방향입니다.
This issue has transferred to our official plugin plan #241
Related: https://github.com/dsrvlabs/vatz/issues/157
Checklist
1. Please describe, what it's about or related Problem with
We need to default plugin that we can use.
2. Describe the output that you are expecting for above
Default plugin that can be used as start to running on real node
@dsrvlabs/validator Please, leave a comments on this issue.
Child
Developments
121
122
127
156
162
173
Documentation