Closed sdhiscocks closed 2 years ago
Merging #636 (323f87a) into main (ee4ad3a) will increase coverage by
0.02%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #636 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 94.48% 94.50% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 171 171
Lines 8789 8822 +33
Branches 1705 1711 +6
==========================================
+ Hits 8304 8337 +33
Misses 350 350
Partials 135 135
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
integration | 69.44% <72.97%> (+0.04%) |
:arrow_up: |
unittests | 90.80% <100.00%> (+0.03%) |
:arrow_up: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
stonesoup/hypothesiser/probability.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.
Looks good overall 👍 Added some minor notes on making the code more readable.
Note on earlier discussion: I don't think we can avoid gating when doing the non-parametric version. We could avoid it for the parametric one, but then it would be confusing to say we do gating in one case but not the other.
This adds the ability to use nonparametric PDA for clutter spatial density, where it is estimated based on assumption that measurements within a defined validation region represent the clutter level.
This change also gates out non valid measurements by default, similar to the behaviour in the
DistanceHypothesier
, and per description in original PDA paper.