codecov[bot]
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.
Comparison is base (
bf40a9a) 94.87% compared to head (9839325) 94.87%.:exclamation: Current head 9839325 differs from pull request most recent head 65962a6. Consider uploading reports for the commit 65962a6 to get more accurate results
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #786 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 94.87% 94.87% ======================================= Files 176 176 Lines 9757 9758 +1 Branches 1938 1939 +1 ======================================= + Hits 9257 9258 +1 Misses 356 356 Partials 144 144 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | integration | `68.28% <87.50%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | unittests | `89.90% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dstl#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/dstl/Stone-Soup/pull/786?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dstl) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [stonesoup/resampler/particle.py](https://codecov.io/gh/dstl/Stone-Soup/pull/786?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dstl#diff-c3RvbmVzb3VwL3Jlc2FtcGxlci9wYXJ0aWNsZS5weQ==) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dstl). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dstl):umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Added a modification to SystematicResampler to allow an optional argument "nparts" to be added to the resample method of the class. If this is not defined or equal to the length of the input ParticleState object, the resampler will function in the same way. If it is larger/smaller than the length of the input ParticleState object, the resampler will down/up sample to return the desired output.