Closed hsoh-u closed 4 months ago
Thank you for this work, @hsoh-u. Would you say that this PR also covers the work described in this issue Move namespace specifications below include directives #2696? If so, let's link in this issue under "Development" as well, and thanks for doing the work I had planned to do, but had not gotten to yet!
Added it to "Expected Differences". I can not add #2696 to Development. Typing 269
shows 2697 only and typing move
does not work.
Expected Differences
Moved down the
using namespace
statements below#include
statements at*cc
files (#2696 ).Removed "using namespace" statements from header files (#2696 )
Added the namespace into header files, for example (
string
tostd::string
)[x] Do these changes introduce new tools, command line arguments, or configuration file options? [No] If yes, please describe:
[x] Do these changes modify the structure of existing or add new output data types (e.g. statistic line types or NetCDF variables)? [No] If yes, please describe:
Pull Request Testing
Checking
using namespace
statement at the header filesFew cases are not fixed. They may be the generated codes.
[x] Recommend testing for the reviewer(s) to perform, including the location of input datasets, and any additional instructions:
[x] Do these changes include sufficient documentation updates, ensuring that no errors or warnings exist in the build of the documentation? [No]
[x] Do these changes include sufficient testing updates? [No]
[x] Will this PR result in changes to the test suite? [No] If yes, describe the new output and/or changes to the existing output:
[ ] Please complete this pull request review by [Fill in date].
Pull Request Checklist
See the METplus Workflow for details.