Closed CPKalb closed 7 months ago
checked out the develop version of METdataio because bugfix_247_readnc_no_lon was merged into develop and the branch no longer exists.
Ah, that's right. I'll update the comment to reflect this
@cpkalb after finding ERRORS in my log file/unsuccessful end-to-end run, I re-ran the use case with a Process list with only one of the steps at a time. The plotting steps are the issue:
Running wrapper: UserScript(plots_t) 02/10 17:42:44.345Z metplus.e49d1a9c (command_builder.py:563) WARNING: Could not find any INPUT files
I'm running on 'seneca'. I used the ERA and GFS data from your scratch directory on 'derecho'
Let me take a look at this. I did most of my testing on cheyenne, so perhaps something is not working right on a new machine.
Pull Request Testing
[x] Describe testing already performed for these changes: Tested the use case to be sure it works
[x] Recommend testing for the reviewer(s) to perform, including the location of input datasets, and any additional instructions: Check out the following branches of METplus, METcalcpy, METplotpy, and METdataio feature_1344_stratosphere_bias of METplus feature_342_write_mpr_file METcalcpy develop branch of METplotpy develop branch of METdataio
Run 1 use cases, s2s/UserScript_fcstGFS_obsERA_StratospherePolar.conf. Verify that the StratospherePolar use case produces output mpr files located in s2s/UserScript_fcstGFS_obsERA_StratospherePolar/mpr
The documentation is located in docs/Users_Guide/write_mpr.rst
[x] Do these changes include sufficient documentation updates, ensuring that no errors or warnings exist in the build of the documentation? [Yes or No] Yes
[x] Do these changes include sufficient testing updates? [Yes or No] Tests will be added under issue 358
[x] Will this PR result in changes to the test suite? [Yes or No] If yes, describe the new output and/or changes to the existing output: No
[x] Please complete this pull request review by [Fill in date]. 02/13/2024
Pull Request Checklist
See the METplus Workflow for details.