Closed georgemccabe closed 1 month ago
Hi @georgemccabe. I see there is one failing test. Is the land_surface use case tests failure expected?
@jprestop, the land surface use case difference is unrelated to these changes. @DanielAdriaansen and @JohnHalleyGotway are aware and are investigating.
Pull Request Testing
Added unit tests and ran ASCII2NC.conf basic use case to confirm that adding
config.TIME_OFFSET_WARNING=3
andconfig.ASCII2NC_TIME_OFFSET_WARNING=3
both properly set the environment variable referenced in the wrapped ASCII2NC MET config file.[X] Recommend testing for the reviewer(s) to perform, including the location of input datasets, and any additional instructions:
Review code changes
Review documentation changes. https://metplus.readthedocs.io/en/feature_2479_time_offset_warning/Users_Guide/wrappers.html https://metplus.readthedocs.io/en/feature_2479_time_offset_warning/Users_Guide/glossary.html
Confirm all tests pass.
[X] Do these changes include sufficient documentation updates, ensuring that no errors or warnings exist in the build of the documentation? [Yes]
[X] Do these changes include sufficient testing updates? [Yes]
[X] Will this PR result in changes to the test suite? [No] If yes, describe the new output and/or changes to the existing output:
[X] Do these changes introduce new SonarQube findings? [No] If yes, please describe:
[X] Please complete this pull request review by 5/17/2024.
Pull Request Checklist
See the METplus Workflow for details.