Closed AljoschaMeyer closed 9 years ago
Really, there's no problem at all. Vorpal is an infant so real-world feedback is very appreciated - issue or not!
That's a good idea, and should be pretty easy to implement. I think I'm just going to switch it around for the user if they do it like that.
This should be good now.
Hi, the issues just keep coming. I guess I'll have to take a look at the code soon and try to hack a pullrequest or two. I'm starting to feel bad for just posting these without trying to implement anything. Anyways, here we go:
test foo
works as expected:{ options: {}, required: 'foo' }
.However:
test foo
results inMissing required argument. Showing Help:
It would be great if vorpal was smart enough to recognize that foo should be the value for
<required>
, not for[optional]
.