Open Gnappuraz opened 6 years ago
Looking at old issues...
define(_COPYRIGHT_HOLDERS_SUBSTITUTION,[[UnitE Core]])
this should beUnit-e Core
I believe since it goes in the copyrights.
This is the question of what is the name of the project, and what is the name of the software. Do we have a decision about that?
UnitE Core
, as it's done by clonemachine, feels a bit weird, as it more seems like an artifact of the history of Bitcoin and the automatic substitution, or is this what we have chosen as name for the software?
I haven't seen Unit-e
before.
AC_INIT([UnitE Core],[_CLIENT_VERSION_MAJOR._CLIENT_VERSION_MINOR._CLIENT_VERSION_REVISION],[https://github.com/unite/unite/issues],[unite],[https://bitcoincore.org/])
Here also we want to replace for sure at least thehttps://bitcoincore.org/
as soon as we have a website. About the package define inAC_INIT
probably we can't change it because is used to build the exec, but I'm not sure.
Agreed with replacing https://bitcoincore.org
by, I suppose, http://unit-e.io
.
I don't think the package name is used to build the exec. It's more a project name which is used as descriptive name or to derive something like tarball names, if not given explicitly like in our case, IIRC.
This is the pull request to change it in the code: https://github.com/dtr-org/unit-e/pull/650. clonemachine still needs to be changed to do the right substitutions here.
This needs to be done in clonemachine:
configure.ac
is substituted correctly.
define(_COPYRIGHT_HOLDERS_SUBSTITUTION,[[UnitE Core]])
this should beUnit-e Core
I believe since it goes in the copyrights.AC_INIT([UnitE Core],[_CLIENT_VERSION_MAJOR._CLIENT_VERSION_MINOR._CLIENT_VERSION_REVISION],[https://github.com/unite/unite/issues],[unite],[https://bitcoincore.org/])
Here also we want to replace for sure at least thehttps://bitcoincore.org/
as soon as we have a website. About the package define inAC_INIT
probably we can't change it because is used to build the exec, but I'm not sure.