Closed IanVS closed 1 month ago
Funny, came here to say the same thing!
I was working on it recently on https://github.com/dubzzz/fast-check/pull/5108. It should be there soon
It seems that Vitest v2 broke part of fast-check. The broken part is around stack overflows at shrink time. While there is probably nothing to worry about, I may issue separately the bump and the peer-dep change. So far to unlock users, I'll just bump the peer stuff.
Interesting. That sounds like a good plan. FWIW I'm using vitest 2 with fast-check right now and haven't noticed any problems so far.
Published at 0.1.2. I succeed into bumping without fixing anything in fast-check, it was mostly a side-effect of a change on their side but the impact is null for fast-check's users.
🚀 Feature Request
Support vitest 2.x in peerDependencies.
Motivation
I get a peer dependency warning when using vitest 2.0.1.
Vitest 2 and @fast-check/vitest are working fine in my current project, FWIW.