Open nikammerlaan opened 1 week ago
Can you provide an example of the code you're running?
Here's a minimal reproducible example.
After comparing the inputs and outputs, it seems like there's something affecting just the beginning of the UUID:
Expected :a0a34a0a-1794-47b6-b45c-0ac68cc03702
Actual :20a34a0a-1794-47b6-b45c-0ac68cc03702
When dealing with UUID types, the intuitive method is to pass in a Java UUID object as the parameter. While this passes without error, it will never actually match. Instead, you need to pass in the UUID as a string. Other JDBC libs like postgres support this, so it seems natural for duckdb to support this as well.