Open eitsupi opened 8 months ago
Thanks. What other use cases do you have in mind?
What other use cases do you have in mind?
Not that I have any other use cases, but I felt that I didn't want to use another function when supporting Apache Arrow implementations outside of the arrow
package in the future.
What do you mean by "supporting Apache Arrow implementations" -- nanoarrow?
What other table-like objects would we want to register?
I assumed something like nanoarrow array or polars DataFrame. Of course to support them, the C++ code in the duckdb package would have to be changed, I suppose.
But if we change the C++ code anyway, we can surely add a new duckdb_register_*()
function?
Currently there is a separate function named
duckdb_register_arrow
available apart fromduckdb_register
, but I am wondering if these can be made into one S3 generic function.