Open duffn opened 1 year ago
I agree with this.
Perhaps a set of rules and why the rule exists? Shellcheck, hadolint, etc use prefixes and numerate their rules and show why the rule exists and how to remediate. Obviously we cannot provide remediation steps for the user but perhaps we can optionally show remediation steps for each rule for the website that breaks the rule?
Example https://github.com/koalaman/shellcheck/wiki/SC1000
Maybe we can use DP (dumb passwords) as a prefix?
Here are some generic enough rules that could be measurable. Each infraction could be 10 points and subtracted from 100.
Very interesting, thanks for the thoughts! I like the idea of some sort of shellcheck
functionality. The entries would need to be manually curated to add certain categories as I'm not sure we could feasibly parse what's in the description to come to these conclusions.
But then each entry gets one or more categories, we can sort based upon the number of categories an entry has, and you can filter by each category as well.
From https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34804150
We should have some sort of system to rank entries in order of ludicrousness or some other factor. 1-10 on a scale of "dumbness"? Of course, this is subjective, but even listing a site on here is subjective, so this should be okay.