Closed bynect closed 6 months ago
Should I close the other?
Should I close the other?
No that's not neccesary
Merging #1227 (a697e8c) into master (19865c0) will decrease coverage by
0.72%
. Report is 22 commits behind head on master. The diff coverage is20.37%
.
:exclamation: Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1227 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 66.03% 65.31% -0.72%
==========================================
Files 46 46
Lines 7595 7637 +42
==========================================
- Hits 5015 4988 -27
- Misses 2580 2649 +69
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
unittests | 65.31% <20.37%> (-0.72%) |
:arrow_down: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/x11/x.c | 0.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
test/draw.c | 98.87% <100.00%> (+0.01%) |
:arrow_up: |
src/draw.c | 42.48% <15.68%> (-8.88%) |
:arrow_down: |
... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes
:mega: Codecov offers a browser extension for seamless coverage viewing on GitHub. Try it in Chrome or Firefox today!
Sorry that I've taken so long to review this. This PR still contains more than just the fix for the progress bar rendering, but I'll try to roll with it. Could you explain how the bug happened in the old progress bar implementation? Good testing is nice, but it's also good to know what went wrong.
The code does look good, but I'll have to take a closer later.
Sorry that I've taken so long to review this. This PR still contains more than just the fix for the progress bar rendering, but I'll try to roll with it. Could you explain how the bug happened in the old progress bar implementation? Good testing is nice, but it's also good to know what went wrong.
To be fair, the only thing that is not about corners is the bar adjustment, which is minimal and I already commented in the original pr. (It just deals with either a pango antialiasing/number rounding issue that makes the lines slightly skewed)
When you merge this I can make the part 2 of the pr for costumizing corners
did you manage to see it?
The code does look good, but I'll have to take a closer later.
Thanks for the poke. The code looks good, I haven't found any issues with it. Thanks for your patience and working on this fix. I will go ahead and merge this. I look forward to the V2 patch!
Thanks. I'll prepare the patch as soon as I have a little spare time since the code is already there. Sometime next week at most
I divided the patch in #1213 to simplify things a bit. This first part only deals with the rendering of the corners. The second part (which I will add soon) adds support for the customization option to change corner profile. Anyway, refer to #1213 for any information on the changes.