search

dvdkruk / spray

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/spray
0 stars 0 forks source link

Inner compartment does not fill its container #230

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Find example project attached: nassi2.zip attached. 

See example2.png for current behavior.

GraphitiTestPreferencesOutline.png and Structure.txt are each showing the 
container structure.

See also:
http://groups.google.com/group/spray-users/browse_thread/thread/d6724f189772127e

The problem is, that there seems to be a container shape to much in the 
hierarchy or at least the container for the invisible rectangle should not be 
selectable resp. should resize with the container with the visible rectangle.

Via Juno Update Site I have installed Graphiti SDK to get the Graphiti test 
preferences, so can select the containers in the outline view. By this the 
container is also selected in the diagram and I can resize invisible as well as 
visible rectangles. See ResizedViaOutlineViewSelection.PNG for the result.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by de.abg.r...@gmail.com on 23 Dec 2012 at 11:43

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I traced the creation of objects and found an error in adding a sequence at the 
lower levels. Workling on a solution.

Original comment by joswar...@gmail.com on 21 Jan 2013 at 12:26

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by joswar...@gmail.com on 21 Jan 2013 at 12:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
The problem was that Spray assumed that references that were created inside a 
compartment are always of a many multiplicity.  For multiplicity one things 
went wrong because the old domain object was removed, but the old shape 
remained in the diagram. Not seeing any properties of such a shape was because 
there was no connected business object anymore. SOlved by removing the shaes if 
the multiplicity is one.

Original comment by joswar...@gmail.com on 21 Jan 2013 at 5:43

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
This issue was closed by revision 89904bbfe874.

Original comment by joswar...@gmail.com on 21 Jan 2013 at 8:10