Closed RongkunYang closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your interest in our work.
OK, thank you for your fast response, I also meet another problem, when I trained the code following the below setting:
The best results achieved AP = 57.1, lower than the 58.4. May I ask if there are other details that I need pay attention to?
I also trained the model again. The best result was 57.6 AP, lower than 58.4 AP in the paper.
@triton99 May I ask how is your experiment setting? I'm also wondering why the validation results during training process of mine seem to be unstable, thank you.
I use default config, sstnet pretrained ckpt from SPFormer, and a V100 GPU.
Thanks for your interest in our work. The validation results really fluctuate too much (it depends on many factors including training environment, randomness of some operations, etc.). Typically, the variance within one point mAP is acceptable.
Hi, XinLai, thank you for you great work.