At the moment, we subscribe to reactive queries in parent components. Then, we .get() each of the documents, and pass that document down through the react tree. This is great, because the child components don't have to .get() the documents again and simply react to changes.
However, we also lose a lot of other interesting abilities from the document, documented here
For example, an RxDocument has a built in .update() function.
Currently, we update the document using a db.upsertOne. This does not work in combination with all of the revision information, and must be removed as we can see in this commit:
We should decide on a strategy: do we pass arounf RxDocuments, or their version that we got with .get. We could also pass an update function down the tree.
At the moment, we subscribe to reactive queries in parent components. Then, we
.get()
each of the documents, and pass that document down through the react tree. This is great, because the child components don't have to.get()
the documents again and simply react to changes.However, we also lose a lot of other interesting abilities from the document, documented here
For example, an
RxDocument
has a built in.update()
function.Currently, we update the document using a
db.upsertOne
. This does not work in combination with all of the revision information, and must be removed as we can see in this commit:https://github.com/dw-innovation/dw-kid2-graph-frontend-prototype/commit/a9bb8f8703a1641bfa5d7e2a4388195e8a02bdcc#diff-1e866b832c5c86d104b8003096008ce9cf6abd604b1154b8c325a2a9b64ecb4fR10-R24
We should decide on a strategy: do we pass arounf
RxDocuments
, or their version that we got with.get
. We could also pass an update function down the tree.