dwaaan / pyrit

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/pyrit
0 stars 0 forks source link

Version Mismatch #265

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.Any action pyrit (CAL++) is executing.
2.
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Pyrit is functional, but produces a version mismatch error at the beginning of 
any output:

/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/cpyrit/cpyrit.py:63: UserWarning: WARNING: 
Version mismatch between <module 'cpyrit._cpyrit_cpu' from 
'/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/cpyrit/_cpyrit_cpu.so'> ('0.4.1-dev (svn 
r297)') and <module 'cpyrit._cpyrit_calpp' from 
'/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/cpyrit/_cpyrit_calpp.so'> ('0.4.0-dev (svn 
r297)')

For example:

root@bt:~/pyrit/pyrit_svn/cpyrit_calpp# pyrit list_cores
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/cpyrit/cpyrit.py:63: UserWarning: WARNING: 
Version mismatch between <module 'cpyrit._cpyrit_cpu' from 
'/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/cpyrit/_cpyrit_cpu.so'> ('0.4.1-dev (svn 
r297)') and <module 'cpyrit._cpyrit_calpp' from 
'/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/cpyrit/_cpyrit_calpp.so'> ('0.4.0-dev (svn 
r297)')

  "('%s')\n" % (_cpyrit_cpu, _cpyrit_cpu.VERSION, mod, ver))
Pyrit 0.4.1-dev (svn r297) (C) 2008-2011 Lukas Lueg http://pyrit.googlecode.com
This code is distributed under the GNU General Public License v3+

The following cores seem available...
#1:  'CAL++ Device #1 'AMD REDWOOD''
#2:  'CPU-Core (SSE2)'
#3:  'CPU-Core (SSE2)'
#4:  'CPU-Core (SSE2)'

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
r297, Linux

Please provide any additional information below.
Pyrit + cpyrit-calpp. 
ATI Radeon HD 5670

SVN updated and rebuilt, no change.

Great work by the way!

Original issue reported on code.google.com by xpri...@gmail.com on 19 Feb 2011 at 12:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
the calpp-plugin has not yet been bumped by hazeman. there should be no 
problems besides this warning however

Original comment by lukas.l...@gmail.com on 19 Feb 2011 at 9:00