Closed joelgdwave closed 4 years ago
I think the README should have a simplified description of how the problem is solved rather than just sending users to the Ikeda paper. Also the code comments rely on users having spent the time going through the Ikeda paper but it would be nicer to translate the comments into our standard jargon, that is, the comments should describe the next segment of code so that a user with some experience programming the system should be able to follow the algorithm (e.g., "Workforce function W(d) ... Effort function" are not clear without reading the paper)
@JoelPasvolsky, I tried to do this, down a bit further in the README. I"ll add more comments in the code, but I'm not sure how much I can add, without code.
No more comments from me. Thanks @joelgdwave!
Please consider this repository for inclusion in dwave-examples.