Open mstechly opened 6 years ago
Thank you, @mstechly! @spreinhardt, this issue is what I was discussing in our email Tuesday.
I was also exploring this out of interest for awhile before @mstechly opened #134.
It's particularly misleading due to this QBSolv example. It's a fine example of QBsolv, obviously, but, since the comment mentions the QPU, it gives the impression the example author expected the QPU to be used, when in fact, it won't.
A quick "fix" would be a few more simple examples, separately demonstrating the concepts and code, would help your users.
cheers!
Current Problem There is undocumented behavior, that QBSolv doesn't use provided sampler if the size of the problem is smaller than 20. This is misleading since people usually start with small problems.
Also, it's not obvious why one should
sampler = EmbeddingComposite(DWaveSampler(token=sapi_token, endpoint=endpoint))
instead ofsampler = DWaveSampler(token=sapi_token, endpoint=endpoint)
.Furthermore, it's hard to distinguish if QBSolv is using QPU or not. The easiest way to do that is through Leap dashboard and there is no easy way to do that programmatically.
Proposed Solution This behavior should be clearly described in the documentation or some information for the user should be printed.
Also, it would be nice if there was a way to get data about QPU runtimes directly from QBSolv.
Additional context For more details see #134