Concerning the use of the image https://i.imgur.com/qtENxAG.jpg, I feel it would be better to explicitly state the nature of it in a caption and attribution of the creator insofar as it may be construed as reality in the way it's currently shown.
In my mind the following wording doesn't seem to fully explain what is going on:
Create website packages - without Net Neutrality we may have to pay to access certain websites and services. Imagine that.
Perhaps something with a Thumbnail+Caption layout would be more prudent:
In my mind, the caption would be something akin to:
Here is an example of what revoking Title II may ultimately result in. Note that while it's not legal currently to effectuate this approach by ISPs – and know that they've have taken great pains to show how they are not currently doing so through self-serving rhetoric [citations needed] – this kind of approach would absolutely be within their legal right should Title II be annulled.
I suck at writing, so please do not use that; it's an approximation of the tack desired.
Further (and this may be better to discuss in a separate issue), I feel the image would have more efficacy in a conclusion paragraph later in the page.
Concerning the use of the image https://i.imgur.com/qtENxAG.jpg, I feel it would be better to explicitly state the nature of it in a caption and attribution of the creator insofar as it may be construed as reality in the way it's currently shown.
In my mind the following wording doesn't seem to fully explain what is going on:
Perhaps something with a Thumbnail+Caption layout would be more prudent:
In my mind, the caption would be something akin to:
I suck at writing, so please do not use that; it's an approximation of the tack desired.
Further (and this may be better to discuss in a separate issue), I feel the image would have more efficacy in a conclusion paragraph later in the page.