> In short, I am very leary about publishing an RFC that essentially
> says that we really didn't need twenty bits of flow label, we just
> needed five bits after all. Five bits might be sufficient in a one
> limited domain, but maybe could cause problems in others. We really
> don't know at this point...
The WLCG really is a limited domain, even if it's world-wide. But you're
correct; the draft could use a short discussion of that.
from the mailing list and Tim's reply