Open dwhjames opened 10 years ago
a lot of things are going to change with that... I hope their DI model is good & well tested :)
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Daniel James notifications@github.com wrote:
The Play plugin architecture is changing… https://groups.google.com/d/msg/play-framework/m_bxuqgSKgk/Z4WgfUer19wJ
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/pellucidanalytics/play-datomisca/issues/10.
Hi @dwhjames. I was thinking of perhaps having a go at this if you aren't planning to. What are your thoughts on supporting older versions of Play? I'm not sure how that would all work at the moment, or if it's even possible.
Hi @dwhjames, I have datomisca-play-plugin working for play 2.4.6 here: https://github.com/Enalmada/play-datomisca (You currently have to compile it directly under datomisca-play-plugin dir but someone with more subproject experience than I should be able to finish that up the right way). I also migrated the samples to play 2.4.x format but I don't know anything about datomisca yet so just a few 0.6 -> 0.7 errors remain that someone with datomisca experience could probably fix in minutes.
Datomic seems like a perfect fit for new play/scala 2.4.x projects. A working 2.4 plugin and samples would give new people the critical starting point they need to get to the point where they can help you maintain the project. Can I get you fired up to help with the few remaining datomisca migration steps so you can close this ticket out and the play 2.4 community has no excuse not to use Datomic?
The Play plugin architecture is changing… https://groups.google.com/d/msg/play-framework/m_bxuqgSKgk/Z4WgfUer19wJ