search

dwief-usgs / nfhp-2015-place-name-summaries

***DRAFT*** Code Used to Summarize the National Fish Habitat Partnership's National Inland Assessment of Fish Habitat Condition (2015) to Ecological and Jurisdictional Units.
0 stars 1 forks source link

Consider breaking out data management stuff into its own repo #2

Open skybristol opened 6 years ago

skybristol commented 6 years ago

I suggest taking the data management stuff associated with the NFHP data and running that in it's own GitHub repo. All the codes necessary to transform NFHP data into usable online forms are really a separate issue. I would focus the analytical work on one or two specific lines of analysis or summarization based on the NFHP Assessment process they are patterned from. Be thinking toward what that would look like in the National Biogeographic Map but concentrate on creating a single, digestible atomic unit that can be reviewed and refined toward "micropublication."

dwief-usgs commented 6 years ago

@skybristol Discussion before action comment:

Move data management code to https://github.com/usgs-bcb/gc2management as a notebook called something like nfhp2015-tables-and-views?

For NFHP 2015 I think the analysis is to understand habitat condition (based on NFHP inland data in this case) for a given placeNameLookup unit. Understanding habitat condition entails several outputs and visualizations including: 1) total stream km modeled vs. not within unit 2) Percent of modeled km in each class of risk to habitat degredation within unit 3) List of significant disturbances per spatial scale (local catchment, local buffer, network catchment, network buffer) in unit 4) Most Pervasive and Severe disturbances within unit

I can see that as being represented as one overall analysis (NFHP 2015 representation per spatial unit), but can also see this as being documented as 4 separate analyses. Based on your issue above I think you would see this as 4 separate analyses? Thoughts?