Closed zkamvar closed 9 years ago
Thanks again @zkamvar, I'm sure I had some reason to go through those extra steps at some stage.... (?). But you're right, the nPop
accessor would be much cleaner.
I'll make the change and wait to see if the release I just send to CRAN survives the gauntlet to see if it makes into this release or the next one.
Hi. I noticed that in pairwise_fxn, you separate the populations and take the length of the list to figure out how many you need (these two lines). This is perhaps better done with the
nPop()
accessor:Cheers, Zhian