Review design system site against our ambitions to be the trusted design resource in the department and a UCD multiplier.
Why
The site impersonates tenants of other GOV.UK design system, but we have matured past that starting point. We should review it against our own ambitions and expectations, towards a better experience that represents the work that goes into our output.
Done when
[x] Outline ambitions and opportunities to make the site better
[x] Research who's doing it better and why
[x] Identify key areas (guidance pages) to make improvements the experiences or redefine them
[x] Create a design brief for @mitz-lad to work against
[x] Widen the scope of the design system to promote or be home to other overlapping UCD areas (e.g.: service patterns)
Outcomes
A site that represents our collective expertise in delivery quality design output.
What
Review design system site against our ambitions to be the trusted design resource in the department and a UCD multiplier.
Why
The site impersonates tenants of other GOV.UK design system, but we have matured past that starting point. We should review it against our own ambitions and expectations, towards a better experience that represents the work that goes into our output.
Done when
Outcomes
A site that represents our collective expertise in delivery quality design output.
Who needs to know about this
This will be a team wide inititaive