What does the "NO JS" (barebones) version of Time look like?

dwyl / app

Clear your mind. Organise your life. Ignore distractions. Focus on what matters.

http://dwyl.github.io/app/

147 stars 22 forks source link

What does the "NO JS" (barebones) version of Time look like? #177

Open nelsonic opened 8 years ago

nelsonic commented 8 years ago

What functionality can we include on the page if the person has NO JS or JS Disabled ...?

nelsonic commented 8 years ago

What do we think about the following elements:

Started <input type='datetime'> containing a Date ISO String editable
Description <input type='text'> editable
Finished <input type='datetime'> Blank - accepts Date ISO String editable ?
Update <input type="submit" name="update" value="Update">
Finish <input type="submit" name="finish" value="Finish">
ID <input type="hidden" name="id" value="1234"> the id of the timer. not editable.

@iteles thoughts?

iteles commented 8 years ago

If I understand this correctly, we're suggesting people input the start and end times of their tasks? I think this is good editing functionality that we need to have anyway and could double nicely as a no JS version. Not particularly convenient for the Western market which is used to much faster workflows.

nelsonic commented 8 years ago

lol. I'm not suggesting this is the final version of the app... 😜 this "workflow" would be horrible. but it would work if you didn't have JS ... e.g on a 3G-enabled E-Reader ...