Closed jackcarlisle closed 8 years ago
@jackcarlisle this looks really good! 👍 We can (should) add a section on "Before You Start" to ensure people don't dive into solving perceived issues or adding features that are not validated/discussed.
email
was your keyword.@nelsonic let me know if there are any other sections you want me to add!
After creating an issue/story (before you estimate the time required or start working on it) get people's input/feedback to confirm that the description of the story is clear, has enough detail and addresses a real need/issue.
This may feel a bit "bureaucratic" but (we find that on balance) it makes for better remote working because less discussion is "lost" and means everyone can follow along regardless of their location.
There must be a comment from at least one other person on the issue acknowledging it and/or confirming the requirement/bug before work can start. This is necessary to avoid doing unnecessary work or incorrect implementation (e.g. someone may have already solved that problem or implemented a similar feature on a different project and can point you in the direction of sample code) or the PO/Client may deem the issue/story to be lower priority than something else on the list.
@iteles thoughts?
@iteles please let us know your thoughts... 👍
👀
Looks great! Left a few comments 👍
:tada: Amazing. Thanks!
ready for review
Expands on the guidelines for contributing to a dwyl project