Open nelsonic opened 7 years ago
I would pass the test suite if a rule is not configured. I'd still want to know there was an error, but I wouldn't want to fail the build.
Could we just change the package.json
eslint version from
"eslint": "^3.9.1",
to
"eslint": "~3.9.1",
And then let david-dm
notify us of new eslint releases which we can address separately.
Would that work?
I feel that just having the ci log that we have unaddressed rules will get ignored.
@nelsonic @Charlotteis Totally fine with not doing this if you think disabling the new rules would be better
I think greenkeeper could let us know of new releases, by PRing updates to node packages which we could address?
Does Greenkeeper still require "admin access" to all repos in the Org to do it's thing? 🤔 see: https://github.com/dwyl/hq/issues/100 😕
@nelsonic https://github.com/integration/greenkeeper :)
@Charlotteis thanks for updating our knowledge on Greenkeeper. 👍 (no longer admin access...)
I was moved here via thread https://github.com/dwyl/goodparts/issues/272#issuecomment-310834719
I see this issues was closed, is any assistance still needed?
@Fl4m3Ph03n1x yes, we need to default
to ignoring new rules. if you have time to implement, please go for it! 👍
@nelsonic I tried to find the time, but unfortunately I just can't dedicate it. I apologize for not being more useful, but at least I will try to help on what I can.
@Fl4m3Ph03n1x never apologise for not having "enough time" that's the human condition. ⌛️ you've made great contributions already and we're super grateful! 🎉
Each time the
eslint
package adds a rulegoodparts
CI "fails" unnecessarily... e.g: https://travis-ci.org/dwyl/goodparts/builds/196241118#L698could/should we default to disabling a rule if it's "not configured" to avoid this...? I was trying to add a
CONTRIBUTING.md
file in: https://github.com/dwyl/goodparts/pull/280 but could not because the build fails... 😞thoughts?