dwyl / summer

:sunny: Probably the best Summer Sun, Fun & Coding Experience in the World! :sunglasses:
23 stars 3 forks source link

Should the 'definition of done' be its own repository? #42

Closed iteles closed 8 years ago

iteles commented 8 years ago

The 'definition of done' is a critical part of working with us and keeping the quality of what we do high. It shouldn't be hidden away in summer-2015 as this doesn't give it the importance it's due.

I think we should have a definition-of-done repo (PR #34) that we can point to from a broader, how-we-work repo. Here we would talk about timing your tasks, how we communicate as a team and also point to other repos such as contributing, our coding style guide #22 and our code of conduct.

Should we have the definition of done as the top of this how-we-work repo for now to keep people from having to click around for information, or should we break it out into its own repo straight away?

nelsonic commented 8 years ago

Its probably the single most important thing in any project. so yes, its' own repo. please/thanks! :+1: