Closed RicArch97 closed 3 years ago
This sounds a lot like https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/issues/434, which was fixed in https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/pulls/435. @RicArch97 any chance you can build and test latest foot from git?
Note that the transparency issue was a bug, plain and simple. Foot didn't actually support setting transparency runtime. But we do now, since https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/pulls/437. I also recently added support for changing the selection (highlight) bg/fg colors: https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/pulls/440. All this is in latest git.
@dnkl I should have checked Foot's issues before i posted here 😄 . I will test the lastest version!
@dnkl Tested latest git version and it seems to work correctly now. Thanks for developing the Foot terminal, it feels way faster than Alacritty.
Thanks for developing the Foot terminal
You're welcome :)
it feels way faster than Alacritty.
Well, both have their weak and strong points, I believe. But I obviously prefer foot :D
Using the Foot terminal, and the following line in
.zshrc
:The background of the terminal is always transparent by default. (about 0.5 in 0.0 - 1.0 range, i'd say) I have no idea where this comes from, i've tried running with
wal -b "#000000"
andwal -a 1.0
but it stays transparent.The only way to get it right now is skip the sequences and let the terminal set the colors by creating a template, but that means there can't be any curly brackets in the config file apart for the where the colors need to be, which makes it really difficult.