Closed dylannevans closed 2 years ago
That's an approach I've seen before – I consider the Apostle's creed to follow the approach you describe. I added Appendix A to describe why I chose not to do it in that way. Thoughts?
Do you think that God thinks the ideas you listed should be more important to us than the ones I did? Which?
Lee
Dylan, thoughtful writing. Here are my thoughts:
Your self stated goal was to address a gap in canonical creeds. First by Creed I would assume you mean a statement of belief ie The Apostilles Creed or The Nicene Creed. We could also define a Creed as a statement of belief that guides actions. I would propose that is your operating definition. You set out statements of belief and you then assert actions to take that will address the aforementioned belief.
I would offer these questions: What is your goal here? To state a creed focused on the Human Condition and the requisite human response? See my thoughts below. Is your creed intended to be a summary of the whole of theology and the call to response? See thoughts below.
If you are seeking to focus this creed on the human condition, then I would offer a few things for thought:
If we one is seeking to make a more overarching statement of Christian belief and call to action, I would suggest looking to the Genesis narrative as a pattern,
Ok, bulleted thoughts, I believe that many of the components of your creedal statement fit within both of my proposed creedal structures, there are components that may need to be filled in. Then the challenge is to make such a thing succent. I love this exercise, and it has been meaningful for me to join you in thinking this way!