Closed cossartque closed 3 years ago
I agree with your proposition. What about cases where targetP = 0 (inside generator diagram) and voltage regulation is on? If we let those cases participating to active power mismatch resorption is like we are turning them up, no?
I agree too, those generators shouldn't participate in the active power regulation. As they still participate in the voltage regulation, we have to use a Modelica model in the .dyd and cannot simply use the cpp model. I would suggest that in that case we put KGover to 0 (this is what is done in DynaWaltz for generators that don't participate).
The case of generators where targetP = 0 (inside generator diagram) should be handled in another issue I think.
The case of generators where targetP = 0 (inside generator diagram) should be handled in another issue I think.
Yes, please open a new issue so that we have it in mind.
The case of generators where targetP = 0 (inside generator diagram) should be handled in another issue I think.
Yes, please open a new issue so that we have it in mind.
Ok, done
We have seen cases in examples where in the iidm targetP (or p) is lower than pMin or higher than pMax. In that case we should not implement a generator model in the .dyd file but do nothing and let dynawo use a simple injector cpp model. @marcochiaramello what do you think ?