Closed d-j-a-y closed 5 years ago
Both versions work for me with OpenCV 2.4.13 on OpenBSD.
..but wouldn't it be better to just include all the opencv headers like this?
#include <opencv2/opencv.hpp>
but wouldn't it be better to just include all the opencv headers like this?
#include <opencv2/opencv.hpp>
That works for me as well. I suggested module-specific form because I seem to recall it was suggested, and it is generally better practice in modular projects (e.g. Qt). However, considering the difficulty we are facing with OpenCV's header changes, I think it is better to take the safer route. Can we please all test that general include? It works for me on OpenCV 3.2.
..but wouldn't it be better to just include all the opencv headers like this?
include <opencv2/opencv.hpp>
works for me (deb9 opencv 2.4.9.1)
utACK, I believe this is needed and would merge even without testing with both versions. CI Tests pass. thanks!