Closed AndyDaniel1 closed 2 weeks ago
@AndyDaniel1 @anneweber
Regarding checking the short descriptions of the respective access ways. I'm not really into it technically. So here are a few things that I have noticed. Any changes to the wording should finally be formulated by you, so I can change it in the code:
CUF: Download So far it says "nur für Lehrzwecke". However, the linked list also includes seminar papers, term papers, Bachelor's/Master's theses, dissertations/habilitations and scientific articles in specialist journals/research projects. My suggestion: Perhaps it should be reworded like this: "nur für Lehr- und Forschungszwecke" Under "Statistische Maßnahmen", "sehr hoch" is mentioned in the linked list. In comparison, SUF: Download is only classified as "hoch". However, the info window currently lists "stärkerer statistischer Anonymisierungsgrad" for both access ways. My suggestion: For CUF: Download "sehr hoher statistischer Anonymisierungsgrad" and for SUF: Download "hoher statistischer Anonymisierungsgrad".
SUF: Download So far, the info window does not list the purposes for which the data may be used. The linked list is identical to the CUF: Download list except for "Wissenschaftliche Lehre und Übungszwecke". I don't know whether this is relevant at all, or whether this information has been deliberately omitted. My suggestion would be to add the following sentence to the info window: "nur für Forschungszwecke"
SUF: Remote desktop analogous to SUF-Download
SUF: On-Site analogous to SUF-Download
Kudos for thinking about the content here too! You have identified some important points here we missed!
CUF: Download Theses are regarded as teaching purposes, thus the purpose is correct for this. BUT we should remove dissertations/habilitations and scientific articles in specialist journals/research projects from the list.
Good suggestion:
For CUF: Download "sehr hoher statistischer Anonymisierungsgrad" and for SUF: Download "hoher statistischer Anonymisierungsgrad".
SUF-Remote Here it is vice versa compared to the CUF. The list should exclude bachelor theses and keep master theses (is also correct for CUF) dissertations/habilitations and scientific articles in specialist journals/research projects.
The current hint on the purposes should be completely removed here, as it could be that the the purposes are board. Instead we should include a hint on the respective field implemented in #3275 . en "Please check the approved uses on the data package detail page" de "Bitte prüfen Sie die erlaubten Nutzungszwecke auf der Datenpaketdetailseite"
SUF: On-Site analogous to SUF-Download
Again! Thank you for the very good remarks!
@ewolf47
@AndyDaniel1
BUT we should remove dissertations/habilitations and scientific articles in specialist journals/research projects from the list.
Do I understand correctly that we should edit the list on "https://www.fdz.dzhw.eu/de/datennutzung"? If so, should the following items be removed? (should @UteH decide on that?)
For the changes in the info modal on the MDM page, I have adapted the text as follows:
@ewolf47 no we have to discuss this further. I will come back to this issue next week
@AndyDaniel1 (@UteH ) Hier mein Vorschlag:
@anneweber sehr gut, passt für mich so. Danke!
Für unsere Datenpakete gibt es bis zu vier Zugangswege:
Mehr Informationen: https://fdz.dzhw.eu/de/datennutzung
There are up to four access ways for our data packages:
More information: https://fdz.dzhw.eu/en/data-usage
Thanks for the translation @anneweber . I only had one small modificaiton regarding the checks (see below).
Für unsere Datenpakete gibt es bis zu vier Zugangswege:
Mehr Informationen: https://fdz.dzhw.eu/de/datennutzung
There are up to four access ways for our data packages:
More information: https://fdz.dzhw.eu/en/data-usage
has to be refined