Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
jalavoui,
your working repository was broken?
% cd tmp/
% svn co http://iwidarwin.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/iwi2200@189 iwi2200.189
...
% cd iwi2200.189
...
% sudo xcodebuild build
....
r189 can build and build package.
I think that r189 is broken, plz write the evidence of broken.
from svn_rules.
> if happen conflict on commiting, commiter must not remove and add and must
fixed it
by hand ( it is common rules in cvs and svn )
you dont remember that
i said "you should not use "remove & add" in the reason of no-avialability log"?:)
Original comment by kazuh...@gmail.com
on 25 Feb 2007 at 1:23
sorry , mistype
s/i think/u think/
if you dont apear the evidence of r189's problem,
I will reverse iwi2200 to r189.
Original comment by kazuh...@gmail.com
on 25 Feb 2007 at 1:39
leave it as it is
if you keep reverting code to previous versions i'll keep losing my changes
the kernel panic as to do with ip filter in outputpacket - i fixed that - don't
need to revert
next time you write new code, try to use current svn version - if you revert
i'll have to rewrite code again
imagine we have 5 people working on this project - how do you expect it to work
if one of us keep reverting
the code to previous versions?
if we don't work in the same svn version - it's better to close the project
Original comment by jalav...@gmail.com
on 25 Feb 2007 at 1:55
jalavoui,
the problem in removing "iwi2200/" in r192 and addition in r194.
if removing and adding directories in svn , we cannot watch diffs between r192
and r194.
( % svn diff -r192 -r 194 iwi2200.cpp )
> if you keep reverting code to previous versions i'll keep losing my changes.
this problem is caused by you so you should get diff (examply svn diff
-r198:199
iwi2200.cpp) and merge by hand or merge command.
you must read using of svn books.
> i fixed that - don't need to revert next time you write new code, try to use
current svn version
sorry. what is that ?
what is the detail of conditions of kernel panic in ip filter?
and you dont write anything about changelogs.
> if you revert i'll have to rewrite code again
> magine we have 5 people working on this project.
haha, i want to say the same thing.
if another peopel editting, they try to commit their changing.
cannot commit it by changes for "removing and adding".
> if we don't work in the same svn version - it's better to close the project
what menaing of svn version ? (% svn --version )
if all developer must use the same version of subversion in one project,
open source project cannot is impossible.:)
u think that they use the same version of subversion or cvs?
sorry, do you understand development in cvs and svn?
I want to say only two thing.
you must not do "removing and adding" and must write changelog.
two things is common rules in open source/free software projects.
you dont answer the important things.
in changelog( % svn log )
r194 | jalavoui | 2007-02-24 19:01:30 +0100 (土, 24 2 2007) | 1 line
code fixes for all projects
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r193 | jalavoui | 2007-02-24 18:25:18 +0100 (土, 24 2 2007) | 1 line
u did "adding and removing"? because u thought the problem happen in your
enviroment.
you try to do commands in #1 . if you get error . plz tell me.
if you dont ansewer errors(the evidence) about #1 commands,
i will reverse it and merge your changing in only iwi2200.cpp and iw2200.h.
I will do this since u understand why "adding and removing" is bad.
i seem that you dont have experience of open source development.
so i advice common rules. ok?:)
"removing and adding" is baddest thing in any shared develpment exclude open
source,too.
Original comment by kazuh...@gmail.com
on 25 Feb 2007 at 3:55
thank you very much for deleting my code changes
i've made new changes - but will not put them in svn
i'll submitt it to the forum
you'll be in charge of managing the http://code.google.com/p/iwidarwin
i'll not touch it
good luck
Original comment by jalav...@gmail.com
on 25 Feb 2007 at 4:25
????
i has reversed r189 but it merged
your changes( iwi2200.cpp and iwi2200.h) in rev201.
you dont check it?
Original comment by kazuh...@gmail.com
on 25 Feb 2007 at 4:55
Original comment by kazuh...@gmail.com
on 27 Feb 2007 at 2:52
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jalav...@gmail.com
on 24 Feb 2007 at 6:29