Closed torabi12 closed 3 months ago
I think the right place to add this would be here
hmmm ... if only the binaries are of interest then the best place would be to just add it here
We can add this easily the following way:
local MD5SUM=""
MD5SUM="$(md5sum "${BINARY}" | awk '{print $1}')"
write_csv_log "${BINARY}" "${D_CLASS}" "${D_DATA}" "${D_MACHINE}" "${D_FLAGS}" "${D_ARCH_GUESSED}" "${D_ARCH}" "${MD5SUM}"
That would be great, but for me it's only the practical use that will be a success. :)
Let's do this after v1.4.0 is finished next week
Let's do this after v1.4.0 is finished next week
Thank you!
i like this idea also. its a good way to double check if the binary is the default version or if its edited.
I've used debsums to check Debian binaries.
description Verify installed Debian package files against MD5 checksum lists from /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.md5sums.
debsums can generate checksum lists from deb archives for packages that don't include one.
I did a scan with default-scan profile but I cannot find the md5 hashes in the report. :( I checked the csv files also but no finding. Could you please help where should I look for the md5 info?
LOG_DIR/csv_logs/p99_prepare_analyzer.csv should show the MD5 sums
Thank you, I found it there:)
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. No.
Describe the solution you'd like In our team, we often want to test different firmware versions of a product. Emba gives us a lot of hits, but we test them manually and sometimes we ignore them, other times we want to track them through different versions. We don't always want to keep the complete emba test results, we would just keep the reports. We thought that if all files in the unpacked file system had their md5 hash value included in the report, it would be easier to decide afterwards, when comparing manually, if there were any changes in the system.
Describe alternatives you've considered We were thinking of something like this:
Executing this on a DIR300 firmware filesystem:
If it makes sense, please suggest any solution to include this information in the report.
Priority issue Are you already a [Sponsor]? - [N]