Closed jradcliffe5 closed 5 years ago
Yes, I'm reviewing the performance of that part of the code. The obvious thing I was going to do is to change the order of hanning and ms2mms, currently hanning happens before, which makes no sense. Hanning is much faster just by doing it after mms: from 1h to just 7-8min.
Including both in a single step is a good idea because I have not seen any case in which you really needed to check or modify any of those straightforward transformations. Will do that.
Wow ok, that's a pretty substantial speed-up.
Resolved by #100
Hi Javier,
Was just using the pipeline and thought it may be quicker to do the mms step & hanning smoothing step together using just mstransform?
I'm not sure whether you've tested this or not