Closed PatGendre closed 5 years ago
@PatGendre I think that the key is that the mode detection will never be perfect. There is no algorithm in existence that will give you 100% accuracy. It is a good question what the actual accuracy is, and I want to run the benchmark to quantify that, but people want to use the platform without waiting for the benchmarking so it keeps getting postponed in favor of issues like #325 and #345.
However, note that the existing mode detection only supports 5 modes. It doesn't support, for example, e-bikes, motorbikes, carpooling, ride-hailing (uber/etc). So most projects that care a lot about the mode have allowed users to confirm the mode and specify the purpose (e.g. https://github.com/e-mission/e-mission-phone/pull/528, https://github.com/e-mission/e-mission-phone/pull/534).
Or there are projects that don't care that much about each individual trip, only the trends (e.g. TripAware https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2019/EECS-2019-2.html) and they didn't want people to cheat by choosing a more sustainable mode, so they didn't allow mode selection.
If the tracking is not working properly (e.g. your second issue above), that is a lot more serious and I am happy to investigate those in greater detail. Please send me your logs if you still have them.
@Shakari, thanks, I'll close the issue for now
Hi, I attached the timeline for a recent trip (March 19) :
More generally, we will now enter a phase with more testers and more tests, how do we organise so that you are not overwhelmed with issues? (we have already 2 early testers who said us that some trip modes were incorrect). It is difficult for us (in practice impossible for the moment) to understand enough the pipeline so that we can work on corrections ourselves, but we can qualify the issues and filter them out for you. Thanks in advance.